What's on this page
Why MDF programs are uniquely hard to defend
MDF is one of the most scrutinized line items on a channel program’s budget. Finance wants ROI evidence; the CFO wants to know what was bought; auditors want a trail; partners want predictable approvals. Spreadsheets cannot serve all four constituencies.
The result is that most MDF programs operate in a permanent state of low-grade conflict. Channel says the spend is generating pipeline; finance says they can’t see it; partners say approvals are too slow; auditors find gaps. Every quarter, the same conversation.
The MDF lifecycle as a workflow
MDF Fund Management in the ELG Portal models the full lifecycle as a workflow: request → approval → activity → claim → payment → ROI. Each stage is logged. Each transition has an actor and a timestamp. Each artifact is attached.
When finance asks why partner X received $40,000 in Q2, you don’t reconstruct the answer — you walk through the MDF record. The campaign brief, the approval chain, the activity proof, the attributed pipeline. All in one place. 90 seconds.
Approval routing without email chains
Most MDF programs run approvals through email. Email approvals don’t scale — they’re slow, they’re lost, they’re hard to audit, and they don’t enforce policy.
PD’s MDF approval routing is rule-based. The routing rules reflect your policy: spend thresholds, partner-tier requirements, campaign-type approvers. Each approval has a comment thread. Each rejection has a documented rationale. The audit trail is automatic.
Proof of performance
The most common audit finding in MDF programs is a claim without sufficient proof of performance. The campaign happened, the money was spent, but the evidence that the spend was used for its stated purpose is missing.
PD’s claim workflow requires proof-of-performance attachment. Marketing collateral, event photos, registration lists, ad-spend receipts, partner co-marketing assets — all attached to the claim, all immutable once submitted. The claim cannot be paid without it.
Attribution-backed ROI
The other half of MDF defensibility is the ROI side. You can spend the money correctly and still not be able to prove the pipeline it generated.
The Attribution Engine ties MDF spend to attributed pipeline. The connection isn’t asserted — it’s modeled, with the model transparent to anyone who wants to inspect it. The ROI per MDF dollar is a real number, not a vibe.
This is the artifact that ends the “MDF is hard to defend” conversation. The defense is a click away.
The board-ready report
Quarterly board updates traditionally require a weekend of slide-making — pulling numbers from Salesforce, screenshotting Looker, manually constructing the partner-by-partner table.
Analytics & Reporting generates the board-ready MDF report. Partner-by-partner spend. Attributed pipeline. ROI. NRR by partner segment. One click to export as PDF or PPT. The weekend ritual is over.
Frequently asked questions
Do we need to use the full ELG Portal, or just the MDF module?
MDF is included in all ELG Portal tiers. You can use just MDF in the Starter tier, or get the full Co-Sell + MDF + Attribution stack in Growth and above. See the pricing page.
How does MDF integrate with our CRM?
MDF attribution data writes back to your CRM deal records (HubSpot, Salesforce). Revops and finance see the same numbers you see.
Can partners submit MDF requests themselves?
Yes — partners get a role-gated request portal. They submit requests; the approval routing runs against your policy; partners see status in real time without emailing you.
What does the audit trail look like?
Every action is timestamped and signed. The audit trail is exportable as a CSV or a structured PDF. Auditors can be granted read-only access scoped to the relevant fund period.
How long does MDF program setup take?
Typically two to three weeks. The setup includes policy configuration, approval rule definition, partner onboarding, and historical data import (if applicable).